All blogs · Written by Ajitesh

Apple PM Interview: Should Apple Launch Its Own Cloud Infrastructure?

Welcome to the tenth edition of PM Interview Prep Weekly! I’m Ajitesh, and this week we’re tackling one of tech’s most debated strategic questions: Apple’s potential entry into cloud infrastructure.

The Context

Here’s a number that should make anyone to blink again: Apple reportedly spends $15-20 billion annually on AWS and GCP. To support iCloud, Apple TV+, and other services.

The cloud infrastructure market is massive—exceeding $600 billion and growing over 20% annually. AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud dominate with a combined 65%+ market share. For Apple, entering this space would mean competing against some of the most entrenched players in tech.

But here’s one more twist: Apple has quite a few ingredients required for success — 2 billion active devices, $200+ billion in cash, millions of loyal developers, and a privacy appeal that $$ can’t buy.

I’ve flip-flopped on this question as well. During my time at Google, I watched Google Cloud invest billions trying to catch AWS. The scale required is staggering: thousands of specialized hires, global data center infrastructure, years of iteration, and massive capital expenditure before seeing returns.

Friends at Apple tell me that their internal infrastructure team has been pushing this for years. They’ve built massive data centers, hired cloud executives from AWS, and developed significant internal cloud capabilities. The strategic tension is real: Apple’s services ambitions require cloud scale, yet depending on competitors’ infrastructure creates strategic risk.

Just because you CAN do something doesn’t mean you SHOULD. But what if the DOJ forces Apple’s hand by targeting their cloud spend with competitors? What if AI workloads make owning infrastructure strategically critical?

Today, we’re diving deep into this strategic dilemma: Should Apple launch its own cloud infrastructure platform?

My Learning About Product Strategy in Real Life

Before we dive into the case, let me share three things I’ve learned about strategy at BigTech that remain relevant for solving PM strategy questions.

1. Always try to build Differentiation One of reason for Google Cloud success is that it’s not just AWS lite. It is AWS-like in mant respect but it has unique appeal to digital native firms, Analytics workload (BigQuery, Dataproc etc) and AI (TPU, Vertex, Gemini …). In strategy questions and real life, “me-too but from Company X” is rarely the right answer. You need an asymmetric bet that leverages your unique strengths.

2. Build vs. Buy vs. Partner decision
At Google, we constantly evaluated when conceptualizing new products: Should we build this capability, acquire a company, or partner? Each approach has different timelines, costs, and strategic implications. For cloud infrastructure—one of the most complex technology stacks in existence—this choice is existential. Building from scratch takes 5+ years. Acquiring brings talent and technology but faces integration challenges. The right answer depends on your strategic urgency and unique advantages.

3. Ecosystem Lock-In is a Moat
The best strategies create compounding advantages. AWS doesn’t just provide infrastructure—it created an ecosystem where millions of developers are trained on AWS, enterprises have AWS-specific architectures, and startups launch on AWS by default. Any Apple cloud strategy needs to think beyond features to ecosystem effects. How do you create switching costs and network effects that compound over time?

Approach to Solving PM Strategy Questions

PM Strategy questions can be vague and abstract, covering everything from market entry to growth and expansion. After years of trial and error—and watching countless candidates struggle with these questions—I’ve landed on a flexible framework that balances structure with creative thinking.

This approach crystallized while observing my manager at Google write strategy docs. In every meeting where we debated what to build, he’d structure the discussion the same way. First, he’d write “Why”—analyzing market forces, what AWS was doing, what the tech trends are, etc. Then he’d distill everything into a single line: “What we’ll do.” Finally, he’d outline “How” we’d execute, which we’d refine over multiple iterations.

The final strategy paper would have polished section titles, rich data analysis, and executive-friendly formatting. But the starting point was always this simple framework: Why, What, How. It gave us permission to start simple, collect disparate data points, and gradually shape them into a coherent strategy.

I then started applying this to PM Strategy questions when conducting interviews at Google, and found it to work really well. I call it the “Why, What, How” framework and wrote a blog on it:

  • Why: Insights from analysis of market forces (customers, competition, company, trends)
  • What: A compelling product vision with 3 major strategic pillars
  • How: Concrete features to showcase how this vision can be executed

This approach provides structure while leaving room for creative thinking. Let me demonstrate with Apple’s cloud infrastructure dilemma.

The Case

Interviewer: “You’re a Senior PM at Apple. Tim Cook has asked you to evaluate whether Apple should launch its own cloud infrastructure platform to compete with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. What’s your recommendation?”

My Solution Using the Why, What, How Framework

Step 1: Clarifying Questions

First, let me share my understanding of the context:

Cloud infrastructure is an incredibly competitive, capital-intensive market dominated by three players with 65%+ combined market share. Apple currently spends $15-20 billion annually on AWS and other providers—pure operational expense supporting services like iCloud and Apple TV+.

Entering this market means massive investment: billions in capital expenditure for data centers, thousands of specialized hires, years of building competitive services, and a fundamentally different go-to-market motion. Apple has no enterprise sales infrastructure, no existing relationships with CTOs and CIOs, and limited public cloud experience beyond consumer services like iCloud.

However, the market is massive ($600B+) and growing rapidly. Apple’s services revenue has become increasingly important—it’s the growth engine as iPhone sales mature. Plus, AI workloads are making infrastructure capabilities more strategically critical.

Given this context, I have three key clarifying questions:

  1. Strategic Objective: What’s driving this evaluation—is it primarily about cost savings on our $20B cloud spend, growing services revenue, or strategic control over infrastructure for AI and future services? (Assume: Dual objective—grow services revenue while reducing dependency on competitors)

  2. Investment Appetite: Is Apple prepared for the reality of cloud infrastructure? We’re looking at $20-30B investment over 5 years, hiring 10,000+ specialized people, and potentially years before meaningful returns. Do we have board-level commitment for this scale? (Assume: Yes, if the strategic case is compelling)

  3. Timeline: What’s our horizon—3 years or 5+ years? Cloud infrastructure requires long-term thinking and patience. (Assume: 5-year plan to achieve meaningful market share)

My assumption on success criteria: Given Apple’s position, I assume we’re targeting $10B+ annual recurring revenue within 5 years while strengthening our ecosystem moat.

(Interviewer: “Yes, exactly. We want to grow services revenue while reducing strategic dependency on competitors. Please proceed with your analysis.“)

Step 2: WHY - Analyze Market Forces for Strategic Insights

(Once you’ve familiarized yourself with the goals and constraints, it’s time to understand the different market forces that will define your strategy. Your goal here is to identify 3-4 key insights that will guide your strategy. These serve as the evidence and foundation to build upon.)

Let me analyze the key market forces:

Customer Segments & Needs:

  • Cloud Market Size: $600B+ by 2025, growing 20%+ annually
  • Key Segments:
    • Enterprise (70%): Cost-conscious, multi-cloud strategy, need reliability
    • Developers (20%): Want simplicity and great developer experience
    • iOS Ecosystem (10%): Currently using generic solutions, lacking tailored options
  • Pain Points: Privacy concerns with current providers, complex pricing and vendor lock-in, poor integration with Apple devices/services, limited privacy-first infrastructure options
  • Opportunity: iOS ecosystem represents 2B+ devices currently served by generic cloud solutions

Competition Analysis:

  • AWS: 32% market share, broadest services (200+), complex pricing model
  • Azure: 23% market share, enterprise focus with Microsoft integration
  • Google Cloud: 10% market share, strength in AI/ML and data analytics
  • Others: 35% (Alibaba, IBM, Oracle, etc.)
  • Key Insight: No provider optimized for Apple ecosystem or privacy-first approach. All compete on breadth and price—none on ecosystem integration

Company Strengths & Weaknesses:

  • Strengths:
    • 2B+ active devices creating natural demand and distribution
    • Best-in-class privacy and security reputation
    • $200B+ cash reserves for investment
    • Existing massive infrastructure for iCloud (consumer-scale proven)
    • Premium brand enables premium pricing
    • Millions of loyal iOS/Mac developers
  • Weaknesses:
    • No enterprise sales infrastructure
    • Limited cloud services experience (only consumer iCloud)
    • No existing relationships with enterprise CTOs/CIOs
    • Would need massive hiring in unfamiliar domains
  • Unique Asset: Only major tech company that can build cloud without ad-based subsidies due to hardware margins

Technology & Market Trends:

  • Privacy Regulations: GDPR, CCPA creating compliance complexity and costs
  • Edge Computing: Growing due to latency requirements—perfect fit for Apple’s device ubiquity
  • Serverless/Managed Services: Developers want simplicity, not infrastructure complexity
  • Multi-Cloud Adoption: 85%+ enterprises using multiple clouds to avoid lock-in
  • AI Workloads: Specialized infrastructure becoming strategically critical
  • Developer Preferences: iOS developers struggle with generic cloud solutions for Apple-specific apps

Strategic Insights from Analysis:

  1. Massive captive audience lacking tailored solutions: Apple’s 2B+ device ecosystem and millions of iOS developers represent an underserved segment currently using generic cloud solutions
  2. No incumbent optimized for Apple ecosystem: AWS, Azure, and GCP compete on breadth and price—none offer the deep Apple integration that developers crave
  3. Privacy creates differentiated positioning: With regulations increasing, Apple’s privacy-first reputation could resonate with privacy-conscious enterprises
  4. Edge computing aligns with Apple’s device advantage: Apple’s device ubiquity positions them uniquely to reimagine cloud architecture through device-edge-cloud continuum

Step 3: WHAT - Product Vision and Strategic Pillars

(Now that we have key insights based on evidence, we should propose a concise vision and the actions that will help achieve it.)

Recommendation: YES, Apple should build its own cloud infrastructure platform. The $20B+ cloud spend creates strategic dependency on competitors, and controlling infrastructure is increasingly critical for AI and services growth.

Product Vision: “Apple Cloud - Where privacy meets performance. The cloud that just works with your Apple devices.”

This isn’t about building another AWS clone. It’s about creating a privacy-first developer cloud that leverages Apple’s unique advantages—then expanding to privacy-conscious enterprises.

Strategic Pillars:

  1. Seamless Apple Ecosystem Integration (Latch Onto the Established Platform)

    • One-click deployment directly from Xcode to cloud
    • Native optimization for Swift/Objective-C runtimes
    • Deep integration with iOS, macOS, visionOS, and emerging Apple platforms
    • Leverage the existing developer relationships and App Store distribution
    • Auto-scaling based on App Store download trends and usage patterns
    • Built specifically for developers already building on Apple platforms (iOS, VR/Vision Pro, etc.)

  2. AI-Powered Edge-Cloud Continuum (The Magic of Low-Latency Intelligence)

    • Hybrid AI inference: seamlessly distribute workloads across device, edge, and cloud
    • On-device ML models (like OpenAI-class models) running locally for instant response
    • Cloud-based training and fine-tuning with edge deployment for production
    • Intelligent routing: system decides optimal processing location based on latency, privacy, and cost
    • Developer monetization opportunity: charge developers for this magical low-latency AI experience
    • Only Apple can deliver this with 2B+ devices as distributed edge infrastructure

  3. Privacy as Competitive Moat (Trust Advantage Over AWS/GCP)

    • While AWS and GCP have HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 compliance, there’s a perception gap
    • Apple’s brand commands greater trust for sensitive data and privacy-conscious workloads
    • End-to-end encryption by default; zero-knowledge architecture
    • No data mining or advertising subsidies—business model aligned with privacy
    • Important differentiator but not the primary wedge for early market entry
    • Long-term moat as regulations increase and privacy concerns grow

Note: The depth of execution details below depends on interviewer interest. I’ll provide strategic overview with ability to dive deeper on any pillar.

Step 4: HOW - Concrete Features and Execution Plan

(This is somewhat the easiest part because most of the background work has already been done. But this is also the part to bring out the craft of product management. That is, if you have experience in these domains, you know the execution risks and what things to highlight. You can bring your experience and understanding of the market into answering this part of the question.)

Pillar 1: Seamless Apple Ecosystem Integration

This is the primary wedge—latch onto the existing developer ecosystem that’s already building on Apple platforms:

  • Xcode Cloud Pro: Deploy backend services with single click from IDE—no DevOps knowledge required
  • Swift Serverless Runtime: Native Swift execution environment optimized for iOS/visionOS app backends
  • Platform Intelligence: Auto-scaling based on App Store download trends and real-time usage patterns
  • Vision Pro Native Support: First-class support for spatial computing workloads and VR applications

Target: Make deploying backend for any Apple platform app as simple as clicking “Publish” in Xcode. This is the wedge that gets developers in the door—they’re already committed to the Apple ecosystem.

Pillar 2: AI-Powered Edge-Cloud Continuum

This is where Apple creates magic that AWS/GCP fundamentally cannot match. Tie-up with Open AI, Anthropic, and others to deliver:

  • Intelligent AI Router: System automatically decides where to run inference—on device, at edge, or in cloud—based on latency requirements, privacy needs, and cost optimization
  • Distributed Model Execution: Large language models (GPT-4 class) can run split across device + edge + cloud for optimal performance
  • On-Device First, Cloud When Needed: For privacy-sensitive or latency-critical tasks, inference happens locally; for complex reasoning, seamlessly escalates to cloud

This creates a developer experience where AI “just works” with imperceptible latency—something competitors cannot deliver without Apple’s device ecosystem. Developers will pay premium prices for this capability.

Pillar 3: Privacy as Competitive Moat

Privacy is important but positioned as long-term moat, not the initial wedge:

  • Zero-Knowledge Architecture: All customer data encrypted end-to-end; Apple cannot access it even if compelled
  • Perception Advantage: While AWS/GCP have HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 compliance, Apple commands greater brand trust for sensitive data

This becomes increasingly valuable as developers scale and privacy concerns grow, but it’s not the reason they’ll switch from AWS initially—it’s why they’ll stay and expand usage over time.

Note: Once you’ve outlined the strategy, it’s always a good idea to discuss a few key risks and go deeper if the interviewer shows interest.

Key Risks & Mitigation:

  • Enterprise credibility risk → Start with developers where Apple is strong, prove value before enterprise push
  • Talent acquisition challenge → Acquire companies for teams, not just technology; establish engineering hubs near Google/Microsoft/AWS campuses
  • Execution complexity → Phased approach allows learning and course correction; don’t try to match AWS breadth on day one

This concludes our PM Strategy case study. The interviewer might ask follow-up questions diving deeper into technical architecture, competitive dynamics, or financial projections.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in This Case

  • Generic “AWS but from Apple” strategy: Proposing to compete head-to-head on service breadth shows poor strategic thinking. You need differentiated positioning.

  • Relying solely on privacy or brand: While important, these alone won’t make enterprises switch. You need concrete technical advantages and ecosystem lock-in.

  • Underestimating execution complexity: Some candidates gloss over the massive challenge of building enterprise sales infrastructure and hiring 10,000+ specialized people. Acknowledge gaps and propose concrete mitigation.

  • Ignoring Apple’s weaknesses: Apple has zero enterprise sales DNA. Not addressing this or proposing unrealistic solutions (e.g., “just hire some salespeople”) signals lack of depth.

Practice This Case

Want to try this strategy case yourself with an AI interviewer that challenges your thinking and provides detailed feedback?

Practice here: PM Interview: Strategy - Apple Cloud Infrastructure

The AI interviewer will push you on your assumptions, challenge your competitive positioning, and test whether you can think strategically about complex infrastructure decisions—just like a real Apple interviewer would.

Further Reading

Read more about PM Strategy questions I have explored before:

PM Tool of the Week: Warp Terminal

As PMs, we occasionally need to jump into the terminal — checking logs, running scripts, etc. But here’s the thing: we don’t live there like engineers do, so we never bother setting up configurations, shortcuts, or learning arcane commands.

This week, I’m sharing Warp—a modern terminal that feels like using Google Docs instead of a command-line interface from the 1980s.

Here’s why it’s a game-changer for PMs:

  • Point, click, copy, paste like a normal app: Warp behaves like any modern application—just select text and copy it.
  • Works out of the box: Autocomplete, command history, and optimizations just work. No configuration files, no .zshrc tweaking, no reading documentation.
  • Clean, intuitive UI: Commands are organized in blocks you can easily reference. Nicely color coded by default.
  • AI features built-in: While I don’t use them constantly, Warp has AI that can explain errors, suggest commands, and help debug.

The free tier is more than enough for PM needs. I’ve been using Warp for years now, and I don’t think I can go back to not using it now.

Got a PM tool that removes friction from technical tasks? Hit reply and tell me about it!

How would you approach Apple’s cloud infrastructure dilemma? What unique angle would you bring? Hit reply—I love hearing different perspectives on these strategic challenges!

About PM Interview Prep Weekly

Every Monday, get one complete PM case study with:

  • Detailed solution walkthrough from an ex-Google PM perspective
  • AI interview partner to practice with
  • Insights on what interviewers actually look for
  • Real examples from FAANG interviews

No fluff. No outdated advice. Just practical prep that works.

— Ajitesh
CEO & Co-founder, Tough Tongue AI
Ex-Google PM (Gemini)
LinkedIn | Twitter

Tags: #interview-prep #product-management #product-strategy #pm-interview #apple-interview #pm-interview-questions #strategic-thinking #cloud-infrastructure

Related Posts

OpenAI PM Interview: ChatGPT Launch Metrics

· Tutorials

Master metrics questions with the most successful product launch in consumer tech history. Learn how to measure experimental AI products, handle novelty effects, and balance growth with safety from an ex-Google PM.